The Supreme Court of Canada has rendered two other intellectual property decisions.  This time, both concern the protection of famous trademarks, i.e. Barbie, the doll vs. the Montreal restaurants; and Veuve Clicquot, the champagne vs. the clothing stores.  Final answer: trademarks are used and protected in association with wares and services, and famous trademarks do not get monopoly over the use of the marks in the whole marketplace.  The fact that a mark is famous would be one of the surrounding circumstances to be considered in the s. 6(5) confusion test, but famous-ness alone does not override the other factors of confusion.  No confusion?  No problem.  Sweet!