Sing along now – Bomb Iraq

Sing to the tune of « If you are happy and you know it [clap your hands] »:

If you cannot find Osama, bomb Iraq
If the markets are a drama, bomb Iraq
If the terrorists are frisky
And Pakistan is looking shifty
North Korea is too risky
Bomb Iraq.

If we have no allies with us, bomb Iraq
If we think that someone’s dissed us, bomb Iraq
So to hell with the inspections
Let’s look tough for the elections
Close your mind and take directions
Bomb Iraq.

It’s pre-emptive non-aggression, bomb Iraq
To prevent this mass destruction, bomb Iraq
They’ve got weapons we can’t see
And that’s all the proof we need
If they’re not there, they must be
Bomb Iraq.

If you never were elected, bomb Iraq
If your mood is quite dejected, bomb Iraq
If you think Saddam’s gone mad
With the weapons that he had
And he tried to kill your dad
Bomb Iraq.

If corporate fraud’s a-growin’, bomb Iraq
If your ties to it are showin’, bomb Iraq
If your politics are sleazy
And hiding that ain’t easy
And your manhood’s getting queasy
Bomb Iraq.

Fall in line and follow orders, bomb Iraq
For our might knows not our borders, bomb Iraq
Disagree? We’ll call it treason
Let’s make war not love this season
Even if we have no reason
Bomb Iraq.

Got this from Fizzz, saw it half a dozen times, and I’m finally posting it in honor of the Powell speech and of Guernica and it’s Christo makeover. Apparently the original appearance of the song is at common dreams, well at least there it has an author and a publication date…

EC allows music downloading in antipiracy proposal

You’ve seen the IDG story at ITWorld (ok maybe not) and at Maccentral (I’m sure Fleecy noticed). But no one bothered to link to the original document. Quite frankly, I didn’t bother to look it up myself (or repost the same story here) until Cla pointed it out to me (that’s the press release, here are the documents of the commission). As always, thanks.

Let it be noted that despite the title of the IDG article, this proposed directive aims to fight counterfeiting and piracy and it’s content it totally coherent with those goals. e.g. Criminal liability for intentional and serious infringement. It does seem to mostly target large scale counterfeiters; they do qualify it as containing « TRIPS plus » rules.

I don’t pretend to be able to understand the EU style of redaction for the directives, but as far as downloading is concerned, the FAQ states:

Q. Will this Directive mean that young people using file swapping software via their PCs will be held liable for IPR infringement?
A.The proposed Directive would not introduce tougher sanctions against individuals downloading the odd track for non-commercial purposes, though it would not stop Member State authorities from introducing and applying tougher laws.The scope of this proposal covers infringements carried out for commercial purposes or which cause significant harm to the rightholder.File swapping may be considered a copyright infringement depending on the national law in question.This proposal only covers illegal acts, where authorisation has not been given by the rightholder or where the appropriate remuneration has not been paid for the use of that piece of intellectual property.Exchanging illegal content over the internet is an illegal act, or an infringement of copyright if it relates to music files.[…]

Pierre Gallois

« If you put tomfoolery into a computer, nothing comes out of it but tomfoolery. But this tomfoolery, having passed through a very expensive machine, is somehow enobled and no-one dares criticize it. »

And this is why I hate PowerPoint

[via Quotes of the Day]